Error
Includes and Included by are omitted for modules with errors
ni
++ 0% (Reading text)
++ 5% (Analysing sentences)
++ 15% (Drawing inferences)
++ 20% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 23% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 26% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 29% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 32% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 35% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 38% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 41% (Generating code)
++ 44% (Generating code)
++ 47% (Generating code)
++ 50% (Generating code)
++ 53% (Generating code)
++ 56% (Generating code)
++ 59% (Generating code)
++ 62% (Generating code)
++ 65% (Generating code)
++ 68% (Generating code)
++ 71% (Generating code)
++ 74% (Generating code)
++ 77% (Generating code)
++ 80% (Generating code)
++ 83% (Generating code)
++ 86% (Generating code)
++ 89% (Generating code)
In the line 'say "[regarding the player][maiuscolo][ [...]
previously-hidden-under the noun]."' hiding under it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that 'maiuscolo'
would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say' that
I know. So I tried to read 'maiuscolo' as a value of some kind (because
it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way either.
Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance,
if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.
In the line 'say "[regarding the player][maiuscolo][ [...]
previously-hidden-under the noun]."' hiding under it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that 'Hai' would be
something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say' that I know.
So I tried to read 'Hai' as a value of some kind (because it's legal to say
values), but couldn't make sense of it that way either. Sometimes this
happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance, if you've
omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.
In the line 'say "[regarding the player][maiuscolo][ [...]
previously-hidden-under the noun]."' hiding under it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that 'maiuscolo'
would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say' that
I know. So I tried to read 'maiuscolo' as a value of some kind (because
it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way either.
Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance,
if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.
In the line 'say "Sotto [the obj] [regarding the pla [...] t of things
hidden under the obj]."' hiding under it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that 'trovi' would
be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say' that I
know. So I tried to read 'trovi' as a value of some kind (because it's
legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way either.
Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance,
if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.
++ 92% (Generating code)
++ 95% (Generating code)
++ 98% (Generating code)
In the sentence 'if hidden-obj is not feminine gender' hiding under it by leonardo
boselli, it looks as if you intend
'hidden-obj is not feminine gender' to be a condition, but taken literally
that says that an object is the same as a value. Maybe you intended to say
that the object has a property - but right now a grammatical gender is not
yet a property; if you want to use it as one, you'll need to say so. (You
can turn a kind of value - say, 'colour' - into a property by writing - say
- 'A thing has a colour.')
I was trying to match this phrase:
if (hidden-obj is not feminine gender - a condition):
I recognised:
hidden-obj is not feminine gender = a condition
In the line '"Non [regarding the player][puoi] m [...] nulla sotto [ap
the second noun]."' hiding under it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that 'puoi' would be
something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say' that I know.
So I tried to read 'puoi' as a value of some kind (because it's legal to
say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way either. Sometimes this
happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance, if you've
omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.
In the line '"Non [regarding the player][puoi] m [...] nulla sotto [ap
the second noun]."' hiding under it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that 'ap the second
noun' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of
'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'ap the second noun' as a value of
some kind (because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it
that way either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong
- for instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of
the 'say' phrase.
++ Ended: Translation failed: 7 problems found